Get Your Strategy On
Last week I mentioned that Buzzmarketing by Mark Hughes has been one of my favorite reads of the summer. As it turns out, Mark actually responded to that post and sent me a nice note. That speaks volumes to me about the integrity of the message he’s trying share with the rest of us mere mortals.
The entire book is filled with great insights about getting the word out about your organization. Some marketplace books you read take a lot to translate into the church world. This one doesn’t take much imagination to see how the principles Mark teaches easily apply to what we’re hoping to accomplish through ministry. As I’ve mentioned previously, about 75% of the people who attend our church come for the first time at the invitation of a friend. Almost all the growth at Granger is the result of word-of-mouth (buzz) marketing.
It’s worth the price of the book, though, just to catch the nugget on "corporate brands" versus "personality brands." Here’s Mark’s sample list of companies in these two categories:
Mark isn’t talking about branding a personality. (We certainly aren’t looking for that in churches.) Instead, he’s encouraging us to give our brands personality. Mark shares:
"What’s so special about personality? Without it, products can certainly still succeed, but they lack consumer passion–a driving goal in creating buzz, marketing, branding, and buying."
Here’s my concern. As churches experience success and growth, I think there’s a tendency to become more corporate and have less personality. They continue to ride the horse that got them to where they are, but they forget that part of their earlier success was because the ministry took risks, challenged the status quo and had personality that fueled passion. Because of that, the church generated buzz. People wanted their friends to come check out what was happening and share the same experience.
As time goes by, though, I think churches begin to fall into to patterns. They take fewer risks. They begin to follow rules. They become more top-down. They are formulaic in their approach. It may be the very same approach that brought them the success they experienced earlier, but now it’s lost its buzz-quotient. The approach may be different than other churches, but it’s the same for everyone that’s attending the church.
I’m not suggesting, obviously, that churches should change the message they are teaching. And, I’m not suggesting churches need to reinvent their mission or primary objectives. I do, however, think growing churches need to constantly consider the personality of their ministry and ask the though questions: What is the personality of our church? Are people still passionate about what we offer? If not, what do we need to do differently to recapture that passion?
Part of the answer may be picking up Mark’s book to begin to challenge the way you’re approaching others with your message.
Tony Morgan is a pastor and the Chief Strategic Officer at NewSpring Church where he develops creative solutions for communications, technology and NewSpring Ministries--the church's ministry that equips other church leaders.
[read more...]
Bumble
August 10th, 2005 at 11:18 am
The movement from personality’s to corporation’s feel certaintly a good hypothesis. Do you observe any of that in the growth of Granger’s at all?
I had an opposite hypothesis: that people feel safer (less vunerable) in the corporation’s feel of a mega church. It is much scarier to “explore your options” at a 75 members’ church. The personal vunerability is much higher.
Therefore, it’s simply better to build a corporate culture early on if you want to build a big church from the start. Isn’t it “simply strategic”?
What do you think?
Pudge
August 10th, 2005 at 11:00 pm
Bumble let me be humble. Ok, not really I just wanted to rhyme. I disgressed before I started, and I apologize.
Not sure though what Bumble is saying? I think you ALWAYS go for personal. People come because of many reasons. They stay because of real, personal, enteractions (with people and environments). Maybe I was reading that question wrong though?
Anyway, Tony…great post man. I LOVE IT! Keep up the great work!
P’ (pudge)
http://www.pudgehuckaby.blogspot.com
Tony Morgan
August 10th, 2005 at 11:02 pm
Hmmm… I’ve never thought of Granger as “corporate.” We’re strategic, but I don’t think we’re corporate. And, I think there’s a signficant difference.
Tony
Paul Podraza
August 15th, 2005 at 12:31 pm
Tony, I’m reading Buzzmarketing now, I was wondering if you had any examples of what kinds of things Granger has done in the past (besides the whole aliens coming out of a spaceship thing) that really stands out in your mind as the BEST.
We built a whole series around the phrase “I Had No Idea…” and it included things like I had no idea, I was missing the boat… that church could be fun… We had yardsigns printed up that just said “I had no idea” with a website, ihadnoidea.org, and a phone number. No church name. The site had a flash intro which stepped you through 4 pages, then to the mountaintopchurc.com website. We had a direct mail piece which was the same colors. It was a huge hit, and our people really got behind the idea.
There was even a friend of mine who had “dropped out” of our church for a while and saw these yard signs and was like..”what in the world?” He came back to church a few weeks after the series started.
Tony Morgan
August 16th, 2005 at 7:30 pm
Paul, I think you all are on to something with the emphasis on a great message series. That’s our primary outreach focus at Granger. In fact, we tend to communicate/brand/market our upcoming weekend series above anything we’re promoting as it relates to the church in general. In other words, you’ll see a “Bridge the Gap” promotion before you’ll see a “Granger Community Church” promotion.
We just find that people are looking for answers, an experience, a positive place for their kids, etc. before they’re looking for a church…and in many cases before they realize what they’re really missing is a relationship with Jesus. That’s why we’re so focused on creating an incredible experience on the weekends. We want people to talk about that experience on Monday morning, so their friends will want to come and check it out as well.
podraza.org
August 19th, 2005 at 10:32 pm
“Buzzmarketing” by Mark Hughes
So here’s a question for you. When the Mustang and Camaro were introduced in the early 60’s which one spent twice as much as the other in advertising? If you said that Ford spent twice as much, you were wrong. Conventional wisdom would …