<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which came first&#8211;our mission or the brand?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tonymorganlive.com/2005/10/03/which-came-first-our-mission-or-the-brand/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tonymorganlive.com/2005/10/03/which-came-first-our-mission-or-the-brand/</link>
	<description>Trying to be strategic.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 12:48:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Howell</title>
		<link>http://tonymorganlive.com/2005/10/03/which-came-first-our-mission-or-the-brand/#comment-577</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Howell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 12:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tonymorgan.updatable.cc/?p=279#comment-577</guid>
		<description>Great post, Tony!  Also check out the article in October&#039;s Fast Company.  http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/99/open_essay.html  Same line of thinking.  Good insights.

mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Tony!  Also check out the article in October&#8217;s Fast Company.  <a href="http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/99/open_essay.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/99/open_essay.html</a>  Same line of thinking.  Good insights.</p>
<p>mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Kirkpatrick</title>
		<link>http://tonymorganlive.com/2005/10/03/which-came-first-our-mission-or-the-brand/#comment-576</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Kirkpatrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 10:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tonymorgan.updatable.cc/?p=279#comment-576</guid>
		<description>Starbucks and Granger you can compare, since they both began at least with clear and passionate ideals and then developed branding.  This is why a startup business or a church plant is so much easier than what we are trying to do.  After 30+ years, after the peak days, an organization has to reinvent its branding or die.  Our church had a great branding and effectiveness but then rested in that after it was not relevant anymore.  Now, I am part of a new leadership team that has to forge a new branding and identity.  Ghosts are hard to kill.  So, in many ways, we have to preserve the core and stimulate progress like  Jim Collins shares.  We will see if we can make it through this!  Bless you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Starbucks and Granger you can compare, since they both began at least with clear and passionate ideals and then developed branding.  This is why a startup business or a church plant is so much easier than what we are trying to do.  After 30+ years, after the peak days, an organization has to reinvent its branding or die.  Our church had a great branding and effectiveness but then rested in that after it was not relevant anymore.  Now, I am part of a new leadership team that has to forge a new branding and identity.  Ghosts are hard to kill.  So, in many ways, we have to preserve the core and stimulate progress like  Jim Collins shares.  We will see if we can make it through this!  Bless you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Morgan</title>
		<link>http://tonymorganlive.com/2005/10/03/which-came-first-our-mission-or-the-brand/#comment-575</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 10:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tonymorgan.updatable.cc/?p=279#comment-575</guid>
		<description>&quot;Simulacrum.&quot; I love it when someone forces me to visit Dictionary.com and learn a new word. On top of that, this is &quot;a good word&quot; from Richard.

tony</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Simulacrum.&#8221; I love it when someone forces me to visit Dictionary.com and learn a new word. On top of that, this is &#8220;a good word&#8221; from Richard.</p>
<p>tony</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Heyduck</title>
		<link>http://tonymorganlive.com/2005/10/03/which-came-first-our-mission-or-the-brand/#comment-574</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Heyduck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 10:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tonymorgan.updatable.cc/?p=279#comment-574</guid>
		<description>In the age of denominations the claim was made (implicitly or explicitly) that Brand - denominational label - was all one needed. This approach has helped kill United Methodism. By settling for Brand alone, we&#039;ve marginalized doctrine, cut out passion and settled for a simulacrum of unity.

Keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the age of denominations the claim was made (implicitly or explicitly) that Brand &#8211; denominational label &#8211; was all one needed. This approach has helped kill United Methodism. By settling for Brand alone, we&#8217;ve marginalized doctrine, cut out passion and settled for a simulacrum of unity.</p>
<p>Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

