<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mail Bag &#124; The Numbers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tonymorganlive.com/2006/01/24/mail-bag-the-numbers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tonymorganlive.com/2006/01/24/mail-bag-the-numbers/</link>
	<description>Trying to be strategic.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:28:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://tonymorganlive.com/2006/01/24/mail-bag-the-numbers/#comment-885</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2006 11:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tonymorgan.updatable.cc/?p=412#comment-885</guid>
		<description>Tony, thanks for responding -- we admire Granger in a huge way -- and completely agree that everyone should serve in areas where they are best SHAPED.  I think we&#039;re trying to figure out how to reconcile the &quot;It&#039;s all about the weekend&quot; concept, which we tend to agree with - with some of our staff pastors who do not feel as strongly that it&#039;s &#039;all about the weekend,&#039; especially where their areas are concerned.  They feel it would be more beneficial to the areas God has called them to serve and ultimately more &#039;growing&#039; to our church if they did their own occasional retreats with their areas (for instance, youth) off campus rather than sit in a weekend service with less to do.  We could have them in other rooms doing other ministry, but again, most of us DO believe in the &#039;It&#039;s all about the weekend&#039; concept and most of the leaders the ministries eventually get to serve in their areas come from the big pool of the weekend service.

We&#039;re in some transition here, as you can tell - and it&#039;s all very exciting - but we&#039;re trying to navigate it all in the best way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony, thanks for responding &#8212; we admire Granger in a huge way &#8212; and completely agree that everyone should serve in areas where they are best SHAPED.  I think we&#8217;re trying to figure out how to reconcile the &#8220;It&#8217;s all about the weekend&#8221; concept, which we tend to agree with &#8211; with some of our staff pastors who do not feel as strongly that it&#8217;s &#8216;all about the weekend,&#8217; especially where their areas are concerned.  They feel it would be more beneficial to the areas God has called them to serve and ultimately more &#8216;growing&#8217; to our church if they did their own occasional retreats with their areas (for instance, youth) off campus rather than sit in a weekend service with less to do.  We could have them in other rooms doing other ministry, but again, most of us DO believe in the &#8216;It&#8217;s all about the weekend&#8217; concept and most of the leaders the ministries eventually get to serve in their areas come from the big pool of the weekend service.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re in some transition here, as you can tell &#8211; and it&#8217;s all very exciting &#8211; but we&#8217;re trying to navigate it all in the best way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Morgan</title>
		<link>http://tonymorganlive.com/2006/01/24/mail-bag-the-numbers/#comment-884</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2006 10:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tonymorgan.updatable.cc/?p=412#comment-884</guid>
		<description>Kevin, if you continue to try to include all your pastors in your weekend service, you&#039;ll ultimately limiting the growth of your church. At Granger, we have a number of pastors (me included) that rarely have any role in the weekend services. Instead we&#039;re serving in roles are better fit for our SHAPE (spiritual gifts, heart, abilities, personality, experience). By modeling that at the pastoral level, we&#039;re also encouraging other people to determine their SHAPE and find a ministry that best fits who God has created them to be.

tony</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin, if you continue to try to include all your pastors in your weekend service, you&#8217;ll ultimately limiting the growth of your church. At Granger, we have a number of pastors (me included) that rarely have any role in the weekend services. Instead we&#8217;re serving in roles are better fit for our SHAPE (spiritual gifts, heart, abilities, personality, experience). By modeling that at the pastoral level, we&#8217;re also encouraging other people to determine their SHAPE and find a ministry that best fits who God has created them to be.</p>
<p>tony</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Gregory</title>
		<link>http://tonymorganlive.com/2006/01/24/mail-bag-the-numbers/#comment-883</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Gregory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 08:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tonymorgan.updatable.cc/?p=412#comment-883</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s great that Granger is so committed to excellence that you are not sacrificing the quality of the service just to &quot;fit more people in the doors.&quot;  Like you said, you could seat more, but the children&#039;s ministry, parking, and media aren&#039;t ready to handle it.  If you put more people in, it would reduce the quality of the service for everyone.  People sitting where they can&#039;t see the speaker or the screens, and children packed into classrooms like sardines.  These are issues that make the church feel &quot;too big,&quot; and could convince people to go elsewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s great that Granger is so committed to excellence that you are not sacrificing the quality of the service just to &#8220;fit more people in the doors.&#8221;  Like you said, you could seat more, but the children&#8217;s ministry, parking, and media aren&#8217;t ready to handle it.  If you put more people in, it would reduce the quality of the service for everyone.  People sitting where they can&#8217;t see the speaker or the screens, and children packed into classrooms like sardines.  These are issues that make the church feel &#8220;too big,&#8221; and could convince people to go elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James 'Smiler' Farrer</title>
		<link>http://tonymorganlive.com/2006/01/24/mail-bag-the-numbers/#comment-882</link>
		<dc:creator>James 'Smiler' Farrer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tonymorgan.updatable.cc/?p=412#comment-882</guid>
		<description>Plant out 4-5 churches and ask them to lead them :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plant out 4-5 churches and ask them to lead them :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://tonymorganlive.com/2006/01/24/mail-bag-the-numbers/#comment-881</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tonymorgan.updatable.cc/?p=412#comment-881</guid>
		<description>We have a church of about 2,000 and things are going well - progressive, relevant, on target worship, etc... but we wonder what do with all of our pastors so they feel more a part of what we&#039;re doing on the weekends.  There are too many of them for us to involve them in a service and we want them to feel that they&#039;re part of it.  Any suggestions??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have a church of about 2,000 and things are going well &#8211; progressive, relevant, on target worship, etc&#8230; but we wonder what do with all of our pastors so they feel more a part of what we&#8217;re doing on the weekends.  There are too many of them for us to involve them in a service and we want them to feel that they&#8217;re part of it.  Any suggestions??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

