<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: That&#8217;s Quotable [George Buckley]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tonymorganlive.com/2007/06/07/thats-quotable-george-buckley/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tonymorganlive.com/2007/06/07/thats-quotable-george-buckley/</link>
	<description>Get Your Strategy On</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 15:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: John DeBoer</title>
		<link>http://tonymorganlive.com/2007/06/07/thats-quotable-george-buckley/#comment-3122</link>
		<dc:creator>John DeBoer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 13:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tonymorgan.updatable.cc/?p=1050#comment-3122</guid>
		<description>I'm afraid I have to disagree with George on this one.  Tools like Six Sigma are for measuring the repeatability of a process, not for creating the process itself. There isn't any reason why an organization can't be creative and then employ methods like Six Sigma to make sure their innovative methods are being knocked out of the park.
It's like comparing palm trees and sweet tea.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m afraid I have to disagree with George on this one.  Tools like Six Sigma are for measuring the repeatability of a process, not for creating the process itself. There isn&#8217;t any reason why an organization can&#8217;t be creative and then employ methods like Six Sigma to make sure their innovative methods are being knocked out of the park.<br />
It&#8217;s like comparing palm trees and sweet tea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
