Empowerment Versus Delegation

On Friday, part of the discussion I had with the coaching network guys was related to the differences between empowerment and delegation. We took about 15 minutes to brainstorm a list of the differences between the two. Here’s part of where we landed:

empowerment vs delegation

Here’s the reality. It’s a lot easier to delegate tasks. And, there are instances, particularly in emergency response situations, where delegation is necessary. In the long run, though, empowering other leaders is the way to build healthier organizations. It will be messier along the way, but you end up in a place where your organization can have a much bigger impact and more people will be fulfilled in their roles.

Do you agree? What would you add to the list?

20 Responses to “Empowerment Versus Delegation”

  1. Jenni Catron November 17, 2008 at 6:32 pm #

    This is HUGE! I completely agree. The point you make about being messier is SOOO true. I’ve given myself this speech a lot lately. Empowering takes more work on the front end.. guiding, coaching, encouraging, realigning when needed, etc but once you have empowered someone to own it, the results are exponential. I find that I will never get out of the details if I only delegate. Only in developing others will I reach my full potential as a leader.

  2. Kirk Longhofer November 17, 2008 at 6:33 pm #

    Killer. Nailed it. Straight on. On the money.

    Simple delegation of tasks squashes leadership. Delegation of responsiblity and empowerment fulfill that responsibility breeds leadership.

  3. Ian November 17, 2008 at 6:34 pm #

    Awesome post!

  4. Tracey Smith November 17, 2008 at 7:08 pm #

    Hi Tony! Totally agree! I have seen many “Team Leaders” say they empower their leaders but really it is just delegation! I strongly believe in empowering leaders and releasing them! Jesus would always teach, train, release. If you as a leader can not release, you will always limit the organization in which you work! Trust, empower, release! If you can’t trust them; you can’t empower them. If you can’t empower them; you can’t trust them! Find leaders you can trust and empower!

  5. Pat Rowland November 17, 2008 at 7:49 pm #

    I love this and need to do more of this. I like the “pushback is welcome”. Confident leaders desire this while in secure leaders are intimidated by it. Part of ownership of the “task” is questioning.

  6. stephen parris November 17, 2008 at 7:59 pm #

    The two columns here can appear to be a very fine line until you’ve either been the recipient of empowerment, or have grown into being an empowerer yourself. Empowering people is risky business, but allows you to grow your own influence and effectiveness exponentially once you’ve allowed it to become habit.

    It’s kind of like parenting, marriage, etc… It’s not something you can DO. It’s a matter of small corrections (translation: decisions) over time that change your own gut instincts when leading people.

  7. bob November 18, 2008 at 12:28 am #

    In the spirit of your definition of empowerment, the definitions of delegate and empower both are defined as a transfer of power to another individual. Your lists are great, just not your list titles :).

    I don’t understand your bullet in the Empowerment column that says “I’ll let you contribute the last 5%”. ?????

  8. Leonce Crump II November 18, 2008 at 12:52 am #

    Question…how do you get your leadership to engage you by empowering you, rather than just delegating task? Or would this be futile?

  9. Kayla November 18, 2008 at 1:20 am #

    I loved it. I actually just finished writing a blog post entitled “leaders.” about the difference between a leader and a boss. There IS a difference between the words empowerment and delegation… Great post.

  10. Bob Rufenacht November 18, 2008 at 9:52 am #

    What are you delegating? When empowering others you are actually delegating authority (not tasks). When things don’t go the way you like, the leader must be careful to train and educate rather than “undelegating” authority. Undelegating – that is publicly overriding the given authority even once – sends a clear message to all that empowerment never really happened, we just liked the idea as long as it works. Empowerment takes committment to backing your people’s decisions and training and educating at the same time.

  11. Tim Lemons November 18, 2008 at 11:08 am #

    Especially love the tasks vs results. As far as me following someone, I would love for them to communicate that to me instead of here’s what you HAVE to do, do it this way!

  12. Alexia September 20, 2009 at 7:41 pm #

    Great post, it’s just what i was looking for. Differences between delegation and empowerment…thanks!

  13. Adam Workman February 4, 2010 at 1:01 am #

    Absolutely great stuff Tony…thanks for sharing it.

  14. Dave Baldwin February 4, 2010 at 7:46 am #

    Hey Tony,
    Great stuff. We have been talking about this since your visit. I think intuitively I’m an empowerer, not a delegater. And because of that it’s hard for me to help people make the change. I just do it intuitively. So to get this list is awesome. Another discussion for our staff meeting.
    Blessings,
    Dave

  15. rfbryant April 16, 2010 at 6:27 pm #

    Trouble is, so many times, “leaders” don’t want messy. They want pristine, so they hold so tightly to the reins that it’s barely delegation.

    Hard to struggle against that and learn a better way, but I’m trying.

  16. Juliana May 19, 2010 at 1:21 pm #

    Thank you so much for the post. You helped me a lot during my exam revision)

Trackbacks/Pingbacks:

  1. Links of the Week « My World - November 21, 2008

    [...] Tony Morgan on Empowerment vs. Delegation [...]

  2. Managing Work « Perspectives on Career Management - May 24, 2009

    [...] in the mind of these individuals who are supposed to work on manager’s behalf. Read this and this for a good discussion on the topic. Here are the definitions I like to use for these two words, and [...]

  3. A Few Thoughts on Service and Volunteering | Words from the Well - June 11, 2009

    [...] Sometimes church members are asked to serve but are not empowered to do what they are asked to do.  Churches are quick to give people responsibilities.  The problem is that they don’t often empower them to do ministry.  Let me explain.  Often staff will delegate responsibilities to volunteers.  When they delegate those responsibilities it means that the staff is still ultimately responsible for the outcomes, good or bad.  When a volunteer is empowered they are given the authority to do what needs to be done within the parameters set by the vision for the church.  For a more detailed of the difference between delegation and empowerment look at Tony Morgan’s post here. [...]

  4. My ten development principles | Making Good Software - March 13, 2010

    [...] There is an excellent article from Tony Morgan explaining the difference between a classic delegation approach and empowerment. [...]