<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Listen to New Kelly Clarkson Album for FREE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tonymorganlive.com/2009/03/10/listen-to-new-kelly-clarkson-album-for-free/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tonymorganlive.com/2009/03/10/listen-to-new-kelly-clarkson-album-for-free/</link>
	<description>Trying to be strategic.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:28:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Rossen</title>
		<link>http://tonymorganlive.com/2009/03/10/listen-to-new-kelly-clarkson-album-for-free/#comment-9784</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Rossen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tonymorganlive.com/?p=3227#comment-9784</guid>
		<description>@Brent D: I don&#039;t see any problem with a blogger making money off Amazon links or site sponsors. This is especially true for the more popular bloggers, because typically there&#039;s a higher cost (both money and time) for those who have a larger readership. Additionally, Amazon has the system in place for people/organization to make money from clicks and it&#039;s definitely good stewardship to use this system for a very simple reason: the more money that is the hands of the people of God&#039;s Kingdom increases the likelihood that there will be more resources available to spread the Gospel. Who&#039;s more likely to advance God&#039;s work here on earth? Jeff Bezos from Amazon or Tony Morgan?

PS: Tony, keep posting the links...especially on the days that they&#039;re having a discounted price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Brent D: I don&#8217;t see any problem with a blogger making money off Amazon links or site sponsors. This is especially true for the more popular bloggers, because typically there&#8217;s a higher cost (both money and time) for those who have a larger readership. Additionally, Amazon has the system in place for people/organization to make money from clicks and it&#8217;s definitely good stewardship to use this system for a very simple reason: the more money that is the hands of the people of God&#8217;s Kingdom increases the likelihood that there will be more resources available to spread the Gospel. Who&#8217;s more likely to advance God&#8217;s work here on earth? Jeff Bezos from Amazon or Tony Morgan?</p>
<p>PS: Tony, keep posting the links&#8230;especially on the days that they&#8217;re having a discounted price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://tonymorganlive.com/2009/03/10/listen-to-new-kelly-clarkson-album-for-free/#comment-9714</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tonymorganlive.com/?p=3227#comment-9714</guid>
		<description>meh.  after one listen, there&#039;s only a couple of songs that i would listen to again. but it doesn&#039;t sound that different from a lot of other pop music.  maybe it doesn&#039;t have the same autotuning as Brit&#039;s latest (ugh!).  the U2 CD is much better than this (yes, I&#039;m biased).  i&#039;d rather listen to Paramore, Duffy, Erin McCarley than this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>meh.  after one listen, there&#8217;s only a couple of songs that i would listen to again. but it doesn&#8217;t sound that different from a lot of other pop music.  maybe it doesn&#8217;t have the same autotuning as Brit&#8217;s latest (ugh!).  the U2 CD is much better than this (yes, I&#8217;m biased).  i&#8217;d rather listen to Paramore, Duffy, Erin McCarley than this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Cole</title>
		<link>http://tonymorganlive.com/2009/03/10/listen-to-new-kelly-clarkson-album-for-free/#comment-9707</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tonymorganlive.com/?p=3227#comment-9707</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe I&#039;m going to say this being a multi-decade U2 fan, but I am tending to agree.  The new Kelly Clarkson CD is really good.  I don&#039;t care for the first song as much, but in general I like the slightly edgier feel to the songs.  He vocal performance is very good.  While I&#039;m sure it is there a bit I don&#039;t notice the auto tuning like I often hear with many CD&#039;s these days.  Yes, its still a pop record, but not like a Britney or Madonna one.  Its more matured than those.  She will probably get some money from me on this project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe I&#8217;m going to say this being a multi-decade U2 fan, but I am tending to agree.  The new Kelly Clarkson CD is really good.  I don&#8217;t care for the first song as much, but in general I like the slightly edgier feel to the songs.  He vocal performance is very good.  While I&#8217;m sure it is there a bit I don&#8217;t notice the auto tuning like I often hear with many CD&#8217;s these days.  Yes, its still a pop record, but not like a Britney or Madonna one.  Its more matured than those.  She will probably get some money from me on this project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony</title>
		<link>http://tonymorganlive.com/2009/03/10/listen-to-new-kelly-clarkson-album-for-free/#comment-9700</link>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tonymorganlive.com/?p=3227#comment-9700</guid>
		<description>brent, i give you permission to be yourself.

tony</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>brent, i give you permission to be yourself.</p>
<p>tony</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent D</title>
		<link>http://tonymorganlive.com/2009/03/10/listen-to-new-kelly-clarkson-album-for-free/#comment-9691</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tonymorganlive.com/?p=3227#comment-9691</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t doubt you&#039;re a good steward of that income. Nor do I have any trouble not clicking, as I typically visit Amazon on a regular basis on my own anyway. I guess where I take issue is that 9 out of 10 people don&#039;t have a clue about it happening when they click, if not more than that. And then with Amazon...if they can so easily give their link makers 10% right off the top, then why can&#039;t they just not charge that 10% extra instead and benefit everyone instead of just the link guy. But the underlying issue in it for me is more the sheep/lemming thing I mentioned. In the &#039;relevant&#039; (hate the term now because it&#039;s overused) church subculture, if Tony, Perry, Steven, Andy, Craig, Rick, Seth, Mark, Carlos, etc. etc. says it or does it then I have to incorporate it into my life/church, blog about it, Twitter about it, buy it, download it, pimp it myself regardless of whether it&#039;s right for me, my flock or sphere of influence. Now I have nothing but respect for you and any of the names I mentioned. It&#039;s the following that I take issue with. &quot;I read this in a blog...&quot; or &quot;-insert name- did this...&quot; so we should try it next week. I&#039;m a youth pastor now...where can I find the right spiky hair gel, black plastic horn-rimmed glasses and an iPhone?!  ::shrug::  Seems many have lost the ability to think for themselves and create original ideas, or at least mold them to better fit their flock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t doubt you&#8217;re a good steward of that income. Nor do I have any trouble not clicking, as I typically visit Amazon on a regular basis on my own anyway. I guess where I take issue is that 9 out of 10 people don&#8217;t have a clue about it happening when they click, if not more than that. And then with Amazon&#8230;if they can so easily give their link makers 10% right off the top, then why can&#8217;t they just not charge that 10% extra instead and benefit everyone instead of just the link guy. But the underlying issue in it for me is more the sheep/lemming thing I mentioned. In the &#8216;relevant&#8217; (hate the term now because it&#8217;s overused) church subculture, if Tony, Perry, Steven, Andy, Craig, Rick, Seth, Mark, Carlos, etc. etc. says it or does it then I have to incorporate it into my life/church, blog about it, Twitter about it, buy it, download it, pimp it myself regardless of whether it&#8217;s right for me, my flock or sphere of influence. Now I have nothing but respect for you and any of the names I mentioned. It&#8217;s the following that I take issue with. &#8220;I read this in a blog&#8230;&#8221; or &#8220;-insert name- did this&#8230;&#8221; so we should try it next week. I&#8217;m a youth pastor now&#8230;where can I find the right spiky hair gel, black plastic horn-rimmed glasses and an iPhone?!  ::shrug::  Seems many have lost the ability to think for themselves and create original ideas, or at least mold them to better fit their flock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony</title>
		<link>http://tonymorganlive.com/2009/03/10/listen-to-new-kelly-clarkson-album-for-free/#comment-9689</link>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tonymorganlive.com/?p=3227#comment-9689</guid>
		<description>brent, this one is easy. don&#039;t click the amazon links. hopefully that makes you feel better.

tony

p.s. i&#039;m not going to share how i &quot;invest&quot; that money. hopefully you know enough about my heart to assume that i&#039;m stewarding it wisely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>brent, this one is easy. don&#8217;t click the amazon links. hopefully that makes you feel better.</p>
<p>tony</p>
<p>p.s. i&#8217;m not going to share how i &#8220;invest&#8221; that money. hopefully you know enough about my heart to assume that i&#8217;m stewarding it wisely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent D</title>
		<link>http://tonymorganlive.com/2009/03/10/listen-to-new-kelly-clarkson-album-for-free/#comment-9688</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tonymorganlive.com/?p=3227#comment-9688</guid>
		<description>Not sure how I feel about the abundance of Amazon referral links posted here. Each time I see one tied to some recommendation I feel a little uneasy. Partly because I&#039;m not sure how that (making money per click) gels with the purpose and nature of this blog, but even more I think due to the sheep/lemming-like nature of the subculture that follows it (which I am admittedly a small part of).

216 people bought U2&#039;s album the day it came out using the affiliate link here, which doesn&#039;t take into account the following and coming days. That&#039;s over 86 bucks and change made on a single blog post in one day. Chump change? Maybe. But in a subculture where what an elite few public figures recommend, use or speak is almost unconsciously followed or taken as &#039;gospel&#039; by a large flock because &#039;so and so&#039; said it was good, I sometimes feel conflicted by it. They say with great power (or influence, in other words) comes great responsibility...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure how I feel about the abundance of Amazon referral links posted here. Each time I see one tied to some recommendation I feel a little uneasy. Partly because I&#8217;m not sure how that (making money per click) gels with the purpose and nature of this blog, but even more I think due to the sheep/lemming-like nature of the subculture that follows it (which I am admittedly a small part of).</p>
<p>216 people bought U2&#8242;s album the day it came out using the affiliate link here, which doesn&#8217;t take into account the following and coming days. That&#8217;s over 86 bucks and change made on a single blog post in one day. Chump change? Maybe. But in a subculture where what an elite few public figures recommend, use or speak is almost unconsciously followed or taken as &#8216;gospel&#8217; by a large flock because &#8216;so and so&#8217; said it was good, I sometimes feel conflicted by it. They say with great power (or influence, in other words) comes great responsibility&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

